Title:
On Computers
Comments:
Comment1-Michael
Comment2-Evin
Reference:
Aristotle/Anonymous. On Plants. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol 2.
Summary:
The author discusses the possibility of plants having souls. He bases his argument on the assumption that animals have souls. He then begins comparing things that plants do to things that animals do, to show that they have at least partial souls. One of his examples is that plants need food, and when they don't get food, they desire it, and after they get food, they are satiated. Another example is the similarities in plants and animals life cycles, how they grow and change over time.
Discussion:
I have never thought about plants having souls, but this is definitely an interesting argument. The author (I am referring to him as this because it is unclear who actually wrote this) makes a fairly sound argument based on the knowledge of the day. He refers to the elements as what makes up the plants, and we know that to not be true. I think that it would be interesting if Aristotle had lived today and seen some of his views. This paper may have been written about computers instead of plants. There are arguments on both sides of whether computers have souls or not. Personally at this point in time, I think that they do not. They are man made objects, not things of nature like plants or animals. However, I think that this argument will be much more debated as the field of AI advances. It seems like right now computers have no soul, but if and when we achieve strong AI, there will be new arguments. People will feel that since the computer can think, it has a soul, but I am not sure.
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Paper Reading #3 - Hard to Use Interfaces
Title:
Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time)
Comments:
Comment1-Evin
Comment2-Shena
Reference:
Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time)
Yann Riche, Nathalie Riche, Petra Isenberg, Anastasia Bezerianos
CHI 2010 Atlanta, Georgia
Summary:
This paper discussed two instances of difficult to use interfaces. First was from an unrelated study. In this study, there was a multiple groups of people, and each group had to navigate and perform certain tasks on the same computer with different mouses and pointers. There was an unknown bug. The problem was that when multiple users were moving their pointer at the same time, there would be slight deviations with the mouse movement. The groups worked past it their own way. One group's users asked the rest to wait for them to finish so there was no mistakes. Another group, some participants waited until the rest were done before attempting the task. The difficulty of the pointers caused an increase of collaboration between participants that would have not happened without it.
The second experiment involved a group of elderly people that took a bunch of workshop courses over several weeks. These workshops were designed to help them use more up to date communication tools like email. The participants came to the conclusion that they did not like to use these forms of communication, and preferred to stick to things like writing letters. They said that this preference was due to the fact that things like email are to impersonal. When writing a letter, you have to take the time to write it out, edit it, put it in an envelope, and mail it. Whereas people would send the same size email in just a few minutes. They use the personalization of letters, and the fact that they mean more to both ends of the communication as an argument why sometimes harder interfaces are better.
Discussion:
I was interested in this paper. I thought that it was almost ironic that while working on one study turned up data for a completely unrelated topic. I definitely agree about the use of email. It is becoming an epidemic in our society how much we rely on the internet for communication. Almost all of my friends I don't talk to over the phone. I will text them, Facebook chat them, or even just send them a message on Facebook. It would be nice if we took the time to sit down and think about what we were writing without relying on spell check.
Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time)
Comments:
Comment1-Evin
Comment2-Shena
Reference:
Hard-to-use interfaces considered beneficial (some of the time)
Yann Riche, Nathalie Riche, Petra Isenberg, Anastasia Bezerianos
CHI 2010 Atlanta, Georgia
Summary:
This paper discussed two instances of difficult to use interfaces. First was from an unrelated study. In this study, there was a multiple groups of people, and each group had to navigate and perform certain tasks on the same computer with different mouses and pointers. There was an unknown bug. The problem was that when multiple users were moving their pointer at the same time, there would be slight deviations with the mouse movement. The groups worked past it their own way. One group's users asked the rest to wait for them to finish so there was no mistakes. Another group, some participants waited until the rest were done before attempting the task. The difficulty of the pointers caused an increase of collaboration between participants that would have not happened without it.
The second experiment involved a group of elderly people that took a bunch of workshop courses over several weeks. These workshops were designed to help them use more up to date communication tools like email. The participants came to the conclusion that they did not like to use these forms of communication, and preferred to stick to things like writing letters. They said that this preference was due to the fact that things like email are to impersonal. When writing a letter, you have to take the time to write it out, edit it, put it in an envelope, and mail it. Whereas people would send the same size email in just a few minutes. They use the personalization of letters, and the fact that they mean more to both ends of the communication as an argument why sometimes harder interfaces are better.
Discussion:
I was interested in this paper. I thought that it was almost ironic that while working on one study turned up data for a completely unrelated topic. I definitely agree about the use of email. It is becoming an epidemic in our society how much we rely on the internet for communication. Almost all of my friends I don't talk to over the phone. I will text them, Facebook chat them, or even just send them a message on Facebook. It would be nice if we took the time to sit down and think about what we were writing without relying on spell check.
Book Reading #4 HCI Remixed
Reference:
Erickson, Thomas and McDonald, David W. HCI Remixed: Reflections on Works that have Influenced the HCI Community. MIT. 2008
Title:
Ch. 24
Summary:
Chris Schmandt describes the process used by John Gould to evaluate speech to text recognition software. Since the field was still new, and the software was not robust enough to be evaluated properly, Gould devised his own method to evaluate them. The process consisted of a subject speaking into a microphone in front of a computer. Then instead of the speech recognition software analyzing the speech, there would be a typist hidden behind a wall who would type as the subject spoke. Different algorithms would be inserted to make the speed and accuracy reflect the capabilities of the actual speech to text software.
Discussion:
This is hilarious. I am impressed by the innovation of Gould. Instead of actually evaluating the software, he created new software to simulate the speech recognition software. I don't know how accurate this would be though. If the simulated software with the typist would be close to what was being developed.
Title:
Ch. 25
Summary:
Steve Harrison discussed a project called "A Hole in Space," and how he came to work on it. What the project did was project an image on a store window of a camera looking out another store window across the country, and same for the other store. People outside one store were seeing the people outside the other store. The project also included audio feeds, so the bystanders were able to talk to each other as well.
Discussion:
I think that this was a very interesting project. I would have liked to see how people would stop in order to see this, and the crowd that eventually formed. This project is a forerunner to technology that we take for granted today, like Skype.
Title:
Ch. 26
Summary:
Scott Jenson discusses Tufte's 1+1=3 Theory. This theory is that with two objects there lies a third object in the space between. Jenson relates this to parallel lines. With one line, you have just one line, but with two parallel lines, there is also an object existing in the negative space between them. Jenson applies this theory to elevators. Elevators have an open and a close button, but Jenson argues the poor design of the buttons, and even the need for both.
Discussion:
I had never known that there was a theory about objects in the negative space in between other objects. I found that interesting. I agree with Jenson. The design of the open and close buttons on elevators are too similar. When I see someone trying to catch the elevator that I am on, I have to take a second to figure out which one is the open button, and often I don't even try, I just stick my hand in the doorway so the motion detector can read it.
Title:
Ch. 27
Summary:
Jodi Forlizzi talks about some of her experiences with topography based on Muriel Cooper's work. Cooper's Graduate students published a paper that described the Topographical Space system. This system would allow users to generate three dimensional models that had a dynamic viewing space. The user could zoom in and out, and rotate about a point. Later on, Forlizzi worked as a graduate assistant for one of Cooper's students on a project about displaying one word at a time on a viewing screen.
Discussion:
I enjoy the graphic aspect of computer science. Its always nice to see what you have done. I though that the three dimensional graphing model system was interesting. I also enjoyed the displaying one word at a time to reduce reading speed.
Title:
Ch 28
Summary:
Steve Whittaker partially agrees with Kidd that mass storage on a computer is useless. According to Kidd, there are many problems with storing data on a computer. First is that files are stored in folders, and using folders forces the user to categorize their files. Also, placing files inside of folders can cause the user to lose track and forget about the file. If it is not constantly being viewed, it is easier to forget. Another point is that storing information leads to a lack of analysis of the information.
Discussion:
I tend to agree with Kidd. Folders are great for organization, but there are many files that i have put in a folder only to forget about it, or where I put it. The lack of analysis makes me think of a book I read. In it, there was a officer who had a photographic memory, and his supervisor pointed out that just because you can spit out a bunch of facts doesn't mean you have put the pieces together and seen the whole picture.
Title:
Ch 34
Summary:
Michael Muller built upon Krupat's ethnographic analysis of Native Americans by correlating problems that he found to HCI. Krupat wrote about multiculturalism , polyvocal polity, heterogeneity as a norm. Muller took these and changed them to HCI problems based on analyst's location, translation as a core process, and verbal privilege as a core problem.
Discussion:
I liked how Muller didn't like Krupat's analysis at first and wanted more in depth information. I thought that the correlations that Muller made were interesting.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Ethnogrophy Ideas
Here is a list of my ethnography ideas:
1) Study the life people who spend time at home versus the life of those who go out often, and why they choose that.
2) Study WoW players, and why some get addicted, and others don't.
3) Study Procrastinators, and reasons that they procrastinate.
1) Study the life people who spend time at home versus the life of those who go out often, and why they choose that.
2) Study WoW players, and why some get addicted, and others don't.
3) Study Procrastinators, and reasons that they procrastinate.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Chinese Room
Title: Chinese Room
Reference Information
Title: Minds, Brains and Programs
Names of authors: John R. Searle
Publication: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417-457
Summary:
Searle addresses the idea that even though a computer can return perfect answers, true understanding cannot be achieved. He uses himself as the basis for his thought experiment. He supposes that he, knowing no Chinese, is placed in a room with a set of instructions in English. When a Chinese symbol is passed under the door to him, the instructions tell him what Chinese character should be used as a response. To someone on the outside, receiving the correct response would imply understanding Chinese, this is not the case. He claims that this is what computers will be able to achieve, not full understanding.
Discussion:
I agree mostly with Searle. I think that with what we know now, computers will not achieve understanding in the way that humans do. However, I feel that there is still a possibility that somewhere down the road, there could be a different kind of AI that could. This is beyond my level to try to figure out how and when, but I think that based on how far we have come in such a short time, there is still a possibility.
Reference Information
Title: Minds, Brains and Programs
Names of authors: John R. Searle
Publication: Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3): 417-457
Summary:
Searle addresses the idea that even though a computer can return perfect answers, true understanding cannot be achieved. He uses himself as the basis for his thought experiment. He supposes that he, knowing no Chinese, is placed in a room with a set of instructions in English. When a Chinese symbol is passed under the door to him, the instructions tell him what Chinese character should be used as a response. To someone on the outside, receiving the correct response would imply understanding Chinese, this is not the case. He claims that this is what computers will be able to achieve, not full understanding.
Discussion:
I agree mostly with Searle. I think that with what we know now, computers will not achieve understanding in the way that humans do. However, I feel that there is still a possibility that somewhere down the road, there could be a different kind of AI that could. This is beyond my level to try to figure out how and when, but I think that based on how far we have come in such a short time, there is still a possibility.
Microblog: The Design of Everyday Things
Title: The Design of Everyday Things
Reference Information
Title: Design of Everyday Things
Author: Donald Norman
Summary:
The author discusses the poor design of many things that people use everyday. For things to be easier to use, they must follow natural design. This is the idea that functions are mapped in a way that is easy to understand and use, and usually has close to a 1:1 button to function mapping.
Discussion:
The author clearly is frustrated with the design of many things of today. I agree with much of his feelings. There are many things that are difficult to use. As a college student, I have some second hand experience with this, since I get calls often from my parents who are having trouble with their computer. I think that there are many things today that could be simplified, but unfortunately, society today wants things more intricate and functional.
Reference Information
Title: Design of Everyday Things
Author: Donald Norman
Summary:
The author discusses the poor design of many things that people use everyday. For things to be easier to use, they must follow natural design. This is the idea that functions are mapped in a way that is easy to understand and use, and usually has close to a 1:1 button to function mapping.
Discussion:
The author clearly is frustrated with the design of many things of today. I agree with much of his feelings. There are many things that are difficult to use. As a college student, I have some second hand experience with this, since I get calls often from my parents who are having trouble with their computer. I think that there are many things today that could be simplified, but unfortunately, society today wants things more intricate and functional.
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
Conference Paper #1: Sequential art for science and CHI
Title
Conference Paper #1: Sequential art for science and CHI
Comments
Comment1
Comment2
Reference Information
Title: Sequential Art for Science and CHI
Author: Duncan Rowland
Presentation Venue: CHI 2010: Monsters Attack! April 10-15, 2010 Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Summary
This paper is about how sequential art can be a better way of learning that traditional means such as a PowerPoint presentation. Rowland illustrates this through a series of web comics. He describes how the human brain does not need every image to get the picture, and that given only snapshots, will fill in the missing events. There were two experiments described in the article.
The first experiment consisted of a class of 8 and 9 year old students performing a science project, and documenting it with photos. At the end, the children assembled a photo-story for their projects. While, there were some doubts about the effectiveness of the experiment, the results showed that the photostories helped engaged the students.
For the second experiment, participants went through a roller coaster, and had their expressions recorded. The participants were given footage of their expressions, and asked to give some key images. Unfortunately, only 3 responded.
Discussion
Should I even be calling this an article, or should it be considered a series of comics? Either way, it gets the point across. In the first few images, I noticed that I was focusing intently on what was going on, and what was said, but soon it became more natural, and fluid. As stated in the article, the brain fills in the empty spaces with what should go there.
I agree that in many instances, a PowerPoint presentation is not effective at all. As a college student, I am seeing more and more professors using a PowerPoint presentation during their lectures, and also posting them online. This is bad for two reasons: 1)It allows students to think that they can not show up to class, and get everything from the slides, and 2) It allows students to not pay attention during class because they plan on reviewing the slides later. With the use of PowerPoint presentations, I have noticed that students will take few or no notes during class, and drift in and out. I think that sequential art could be used in some of these situations to keep the students attention, and teach them too.
Microblog: coming of age in Samoa
Reference Information
Title: Coming of Age in Samoa
Author: Margaret Mead
Editors: Williams Morrow and Company (1928)
Summary
In the beginning of the chapter, the author describes different approaches to observing adolescent behavior, and finding a root cause for different scientists. She claims that all of them except anthropologists have no chance of being successful. She then describes her approach to observing adolescents of a similar lifestyle, which brings her to Samoa. Samoa, according to the author, is a good environment to study teenagers.
Discussion
I'm not sure if I agree fully with the author. While I do agree that the only way to truly study behavior is to control all stimuli, I am not sure that the course chosen is going to be as reliable as the author is describing. I am interested to see how the teenagers act with her present.
Title: Coming of Age in Samoa
Author: Margaret Mead
Editors: Williams Morrow and Company (1928)
Summary
In the beginning of the chapter, the author describes different approaches to observing adolescent behavior, and finding a root cause for different scientists. She claims that all of them except anthropologists have no chance of being successful. She then describes her approach to observing adolescents of a similar lifestyle, which brings her to Samoa. Samoa, according to the author, is a good environment to study teenagers.
Discussion
I'm not sure if I agree fully with the author. While I do agree that the only way to truly study behavior is to control all stimuli, I am not sure that the course chosen is going to be as reliable as the author is describing. I am interested to see how the teenagers act with her present.
Intro. Entry #0
Email:
defender19@tamu.edu
Status:
4th year Senior
Why am I taking this class?
I am taking this class because I needed another course from this section and thought that this would be interesting.
What experience do I bring to the class?
Mostly just programming classes over the years, but I had an internship with L-3 Communications over the 2010 summer.
What do you think will be the next biggest technological advancement in computer science?
I think that there will be many advances in computer science, but the biggest will probably be a fully independent AI.
If you could travel back in time, who would you like to meet and why?
If I could travel back in time, I would like to meet Ben Franklin. I think that he would be interesting, and have some eccentric ideas.
Favorite mustache and why?
My favorite mustache is one that I saw recently while driving. My and my friend saw a guy with a handlebar mustache that went into mutton chops.
If you could be fluent in any foreign language that you're not already fluent in, which one would it be and why?
I would be fluent in Chinese. They have the largest population, and will keep growing.
Some interesting facts:
I was born in New York.
I love soccer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)